Cowboy Hat Tip: Mark Shea.
« Whew! | Main | Pointing Out An Opponent's Behavior »
November 03, 2004
Looks Like Someone Else Has The Same Idea
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
Recent Comments
- Tom Simon on Will They Really Fix the Offensive John Paul II Statue?
- David Elton on Will They Really Fix the Offensive John Paul II Statue?
- Hank on Today in the Church Year: Jan. 7, 2012
- Catholic Bibliophagist on Extraordinary Form Holydays of Obligation?
- Tommy on My Friend Being Taken off Life Support
- Simon on The Church Year: Jan. 9, 2012
- Raul on Sin & Baptism; Taxes & Abortion; Mary & Communion; Dungeons & Dragons
- Gabriela from Japan on Sin & Baptism; Taxes & Abortion; Mary & Communion; Dungeons & Dragons
- Michael on Extraordinary Form Holydays of Obligation?
- Nick on Sin & Baptism; Taxes & Abortion; Mary & Communion; Dungeons & Dragons
Recent Posts
- Will They Really Fix the Offensive John Paul II Statue?
- The Church Year: Jan. 13, 2012
- Jimmy on Catholic Answers Live (1/5/12)
- Fast Action Video!
- The Church Year: Jan. 12, 2012
- Low Carb Beefy, Cheesy, Tomatoey Spaghetti Bake
- A Chat with Capt. Jeff & the Gang
- The Church Year: Jan. 11, 2012
- The Church Year: Jan. 10, 2012
- The Church Year: Jan. 9, 2012
January 2012
Categories
- +Benedict
- +Religion
- Abortion
- About Writing
- Apologetics
- Aramaic
- Art
- Benedict XVI
- Bible
- Bible History
- Books
- Buddhism
- Canon Law
- Church Fathers
- Confirmation
- Curios & Humor
- Current Affairs
- Diet
- Economics
- Eschatology
- Fiction
- Film and TV
- Food and Drink
- Government
- Greek
- Hebrew
- History
- Homosexuality
- Internet
- Islam
- Languages
- Law
- Liturgical Year
- Liturgy
- Marriage Involvement
- Mary
- Miscellaneous
- Moral Theology
- Mormonism
- Music
- News Media
- Non-Catholic Apologists
- Other Christians
- Other Languages
- Other Religions
- Philosophy
- Photo Captions
- Pictures From Life
- Podcasts
- Prophecy
- Radio Shows
- Religion
- Sacraments
- Science
- Science Fiction
- Social Analysis
- Sunday Obligation
- Technology
- Television
- The Church
- The Pope
- The Press
- Theology
- Travel
- Travels
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Work
- Year
Good map...only Alberta would probably want to be a part of the United State of Texas, and Quebec a part of France.
Posted by: BillyHW | November 03, 2004 at 10:50 PM
Fine with me. We can trade it for southern Illinois.
More Texans is more good!
Alberta can be part of the new panhandle.
Edmonton can be the new Amarillo.
Posted by: Jimmy Akin | November 03, 2004 at 11:25 PM
I'm currently a Wisconsinite, but wouldn't mind changing that to Texan if the need should arise...yee-haw for the U.S.T.!
Posted by: Sean | November 04, 2004 at 06:29 AM
does this mean I'll have to buy a pair of cowboy (cowgirl)boots?
Our pastor already thinks he lives in Texas, so it wouldn't be a big switch for him...
Cathy
(in lovely, RED, Missouri)
Posted by: cathy | November 04, 2004 at 07:43 AM
I would like to see a county red/blue map like this one for the 2000 election.
http://www.jimmyakin.org/2004/07/election_2000_d.html
Posted by: Ben | November 04, 2004 at 07:53 AM
You know, of course, that Texas already has, in writing even, the right to secede from the Union.
Posted by: Ed Peters | November 04, 2004 at 07:54 AM
I saw the same thing on a leftist blog, only the large central part which went for Bush was labeled "Jesusland." A nice example of the leftist contempt for Christianity.
Posted by: Mike Koenecke | November 04, 2004 at 10:12 AM
Remember that in the upper midwest, the only "Canadian" parts are the Twin Cities, Dulut, Chicago/Milwakee and similar urban areas. The rest is solidly UST.
Likewise on the left coast. Only the seaside counties are demonrat.
I strongly suspect that the Canadian provinces between the mountains and the populated regions east of the muskeg would rather be UST than French Canadian.
BTW, Only the first Texas had that right. And they did secede. The second Texas, granted Statehood in the 1870s, doesn't have that proviso, if I'm not mistaken.
Posted by: Circuit Rider | November 04, 2004 at 11:30 AM
So the silly leftists didn't even know that the real name is "Christendom" not "Jesusland"?
Posted by: Circuit Rider | November 04, 2004 at 11:32 AM
eh, that should be east of the BC coastal plain and -west- of the eastern end of the muskeg -OTOH- all but IIRC, Lower Canada. Or is that Upper Canada?
Posted by: Circuit Rider | November 04, 2004 at 11:34 AM
Circuit Rider's right--the Twin Cities and Duluth/Superior should be chartered as Free Cities attached to the People's Judiocracy of Amerika; the rest of Minnesota should be integrated into UST. (Can't speak for Wisconsin--but I suppose we can live with _some_ Cheeseheads. :-) )
Posted by: Matthew L. Martin | November 04, 2004 at 01:45 PM
OK, how tough is the immigration laws of the United State of Texas? I will desperately be seeking political asylum from Baja Canada.....
Posted by: AJ | November 04, 2004 at 05:53 PM
I think the UST would welcome immigrants who share its values. Therefore, political asylum from Baja Canada would be a legitimate reason for immigration.
Posted by: Jimmy Akin | November 04, 2004 at 06:02 PM
I'd make the move, but I don't think I could handle all the country music.
Posted by: BillyHW | November 04, 2004 at 07:10 PM
Alot of joking around about moving to different countries ... but, I do believe that some people will gravitate within the country to areas that they more closely agree with the local politics.
Posted by: Ben | November 04, 2004 at 08:24 PM
Love BillyHW's comment about Alberta (being an Albertan myself that is).
Posted by: northern pilot 201 | November 05, 2004 at 05:11 PM
I think Michigan, except for a couple of counties, should be included in USofT.
(Unfortunately, I live in one of those Blue Counties :(
Posted by: MomOf9 | November 06, 2004 at 06:58 AM